Re: strto...(3) questions

Subject: Re: strto...(3) questions
From: Antoine LECA <antoine.leca.1%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 11:56:35 +0100

On 2014-12-31 00:52Z, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> We expect a C99 userland for bootstrapping, don't we?
> 
> src/tools/README rev. 1.3 says about obligatory c89 compatibility

Then that README is just obsolete.

I had a hard time trying to cross-compile NetBSD from Interix (which
features the Microsft libc, C89 conforming but definitively lacking a
number of C99 library features) and it was all pain.

Antoine

Follow-Ups:
- building with C89 host compiler
  - From: Alan Barrett

References:
- Re: strto...(3) questions
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

Prev by Date: Code Pointer Integrity/Code Pointer Separation
Next by Date: building with C89 host compiler
Previous by Thread: Re: strto...(3) questions
Next by Thread: building with C89 host compiler
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index