Re: traditional cpp

[Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:02 PM, David Holland 
<dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:56:29AM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>  > > I'm told that we need a traditional cpp for moving clang forward... so
>  > > I wrote one.
>  > >
>  > > ? http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~dholland/netbsd/tradcpp-20101220/
>  >
>  > Too bad it is not portable outside NetBSD.
>
> It wasn't meant to be.
>
> Care to offer any specifics, or just FUD?
>
getprogname(3) is not portable outside BSDs and <stdint.h> is required
to use uintN_t types. Beside that the built-ins macros are hardcoded.

 - Arnaud