Re: Portable type definitions for tools

[Alan Barrett <apb%cequrux.com@localhost>]

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > What particular portability problems are you trying to fix
> > with these proposals?
> 
> I want to make sure that we get correct types if at all possible.
> Other than the requirement of the compiler to support C90 and a 64bit
> type, nothing should be needed. This is currently not the case.

Let me try to rephrase a question that I've asked before.

Which host platforms (a) are currently unable to cross-build NetBSD, and
(b) were previously able to cross-build NetBSD?  What specific problems
do platforms in the intersection of (a && b) encounter?

--apb (Alan Barrett)