On Wed Aug 22 2007 at 14:11:44 +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> Hmm, I've been always wondering, why we bother with
> /usr/libexec/ld.elf_so at all, it's symlink to /libexec anyway.
> 
> Does anyone knows/remembers the rationale?

My guess: / wasn't always dynamic, /libexec didn't exist and old binaries
have /usr/libexec/ld.elf_so as their interpreter.

-- 
Antti Kantee <pooka@iki.fi>                     Of course he runs NetBSD
http://www.iki.fi/pooka/                          http://www.NetBSD.org/
    "la qualité la plus indispensable du cuisinier est l'exactitude"