In article <060827222117.M0116661@mirage.ceres.dti.ne.jp>,
Izumi Tsutsui  <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp> wrote:
>Is it okay to commit the following patch for PR 33431,
>to allow building standalone programs without DESTDIR?
>(arch/sparc/stand/bootblk/Makefile also requires the similar fix)

Sure.

christos

>
><060726204808.M0117230@mirage.ceres.dti.ne.jp> on source-changes
>I wrote:
>
>> simonb@NetBSD.org wrote:
>> 
>> > We previously had a (unwritten?) goal of being able to build
>> > sys/arch/*/stand without ${DESTDIR}.  Do we still want to be able to do
>> > this?  I still find it handy to be able to do this to test out fixes and
>> > changes for bootblocks without having to run a partial build.sh first...
>> 
>> IMHO, the required fix is trivial, so we should keep
>> the (actually useful and reasonable) goal :-)
>> (though I'm not sure which Makefile or Makefile.inc is better)
>> ---
>> Izumi Tsutsui
>> 
>> 
>> Index: sys/lib/libkern/Makefile
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/lib/libkern/Makefile,v
>> retrieving revision 1.80
>> diff -u -r1.80 Makefile
>> --- sys/lib/libkern/Makefile	27 Apr 2006 20:43:09 -0000	1.80
>> +++ sys/lib/libkern/Makefile	26 Jul 2006 11:42:19 -0000
>> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
>>  .include "${.PARSEDIR}/../../../common/lib/libc/Makefile.inc"
>>  .include "${.PARSEDIR}/../../../common/lib/libprop/Makefile.inc"
>>  
>> +CPPFLAGS+=	-I${KERNDIR}/../../../common/include
>> +
>>  .PATH.c: ${KERNDIR}
>>  .if exists ($M/Makefile.inc)
>>  .PATH.c: $M
>> 
>