On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:06 PM, matthew green wrote:

> which compiles to use "sw" in both the novoid cases and swl/swr in
> the other case.  ie, when GCC starts off with what it believes
> should be an aligned pointer ("Elf_Addr *p"), or ends up with one
> via an assignment, it will keep that information right into builtins
> like this and optimise based on it.

what happens if you make store_ptr() not an inline?


>
>
> i'm pretty sure simon's patch, while intrusive, is pretty much
> the right thing.
>
>
> .mrg.

-- thorpej