matthew green wrote:
>    
>    > I had some conversation with others, including phone, that indicated to
>    > me that just committing should be okay.  This occurred after no other
>    > response for ~24 hours.
>    
>    Well, IMHO waiting ~24 hours isn't enough, but I'll shut up since
>    I'm not a toolchain guy.
>
> i told garrett to commit this.
>    
>    > HAVE_NBTOOL_CONFIG_H is the easiest way to know that you are building
>    > cross- tools, so that's what I used.
>    > 
>    > If anyone else feels more strongly about this, I (or they) can certainly
>    > change it, since what I did has been committed to -current for a couple
>    > of days now. :-)
>    
>    I don't think HAVE_NBTOOL_CONFIG_H is a proper way,
>    but it's just my two cents.
>
>
> actually, i think it may just be best done by conditionalising it
> on the presense of TIOCGWINSZ define?  we don't use a special header
> to find that so i think it will just work fine.
>   

No, it won't.  TIOCGWINSZ is defined on Solaris, but the struct winsize
typedef lives somewhere else.

    -- Garrett
>
> .mrg.
>   


-- 
Garrett D'Amore, Principal Software Engineer
Tadpole Computer / Computing Technologies Division,
General Dynamics C4 Systems
http://www.tadpolecomputer.com/
Phone: 951 325-2134  Fax: 951 325-2191