>> [GNU-style indentation]
> GNU double indents are ugly, in the opinion of many here,

Not that that means much by itself.  For exmaple, I find KNF much
horrider than anything GNU has done (wrt whitespace, at least).
No individual's aesthetics do (or, IMO, should) rule here.

> and NetBSD-supplied sources (meaning, not including `dist') should
> follow the established KNF standard.

Yes; it is more important that a standard be followed than which
standard it is.  Ugly as I find KNF, I'd rather have, for Project
purposes, uniform KNF than the mishmash of almost as many different
styles as there are developers that would result if we hadn't picked a
single style to stick with.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B