In article <Pine.NEB.4.61.0412191237070.22936@lain.ziaspace.com>,
	john@ziaspace.com (John Klos) writes:
> 
> I just noticed that build.sh' install target implies -u, which makes 
> sense, but the release target does not, and that it tries to clean and 
> build everything from scratch. Shouldn't build.sh be more consistent 
> regarding this?

Why do you say that?

It would strange and unfriendly indeed if an "install" following a "build"
deleted the binaries that were just built.  "install" isn't useful without
"-u", because if you'd wanted to build and install in one step, you would
have used "build". That argument doesn't apply to any of the other targets.


Frederick