On Friday 19 November 2004 08:50, Jason R. Fink wrote:
> > > It can create bootable and non-bootable images.
> >
> > Why non-bootable ones?
>
> When I originally started it there was an idea that having
> a non bootable option would be good if, for example,
> you only wanted to capture srcsets or wanted it to
> only be a data cd (eg you accidentally left it in the
> drive).
>
> I'm still on the fence as to whether or not the noboot
> option is really needed.

I don't think its worth it.

Just my 0.02GBP

Nick