--EeeDLpRJNGbogvEL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:13:04PM -0700, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:
  | Personally, I'd go with:
  |=20
  | > no
  |=20
  | as in, no compelling reason to do it (that i'm aware of 8-).

We want to separate
	.so as PIC object component of a shared library
from
	.so as a shared library
to simplify building of dlopen-able objects that aren't named
"libfoo.so".  (This is a separate issue I'm working on).

So, even without moving the former (PIC object) to .lo, I'd like
to seriously consider moving it to another non-.so suffix.

--EeeDLpRJNGbogvEL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBeGoSpBhtmn8zJHIRAmxAAJ9ymW/ScJsFrghHR7gCLlcSXliMogCg1N0Y
ip3+T95XwkB1IRzIMPC8s2s=
=PFXQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--EeeDLpRJNGbogvEL--