Subject: Re: someone thinking of gdb-6 integration?
To: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: John R. Shannon <email@example.com>
Date: 05/05/2004 12:25:16
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I've ported both gcc-3.4 and gdb 6.1. These packages are on WIP. gcc-3.4 is=
rather good shape in i86 and amd64.
gdb 6.1 is usable on these platforms. I'm actively working on it.
On Wednesday 05 May 2004 11:38 am, you wrote:
> In article <200405050913.LAA0000147410@zel459.zel.kfa-juelich.de>,
> Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de> wrote:
> >In conjunction with gcc's Ada support the question came up
> >whether it is better to fix amd64 support on gdb5 (where Ada
> >support exists), or to add Ada support to gdb6 (which supports
> >So is there already a plan to pull gdb6 into the main tree?
> >What about gcc-3.4?
> I'll be doing gdb-6 after another suck^Wvolunteer finishes 3.4
> integration. So the answer is that it is better to work on adding
> ada to gdb-6 (from all perspectives).
John R. Shannon
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----