On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44PM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> 
> On Dec 16, 2003, at 5:04 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> 
> >Remember, we don't
> >want the in-tree gcc to behave differently than let's say the pkgsrc 
> >cross-gcc!
> 
> I would also place an additional constraint on it -- a local patch like 
> this must first be accepted by the FSF GCC upstream.
> 

It was just a thought mainly. If the consensus is, that leaving a warning in
that will cause unexpected results, so be it..(I don't have the time to
deal with fighting this into the FSF tree). Mainly it turns a cpp error
into a compiler error if you follow the advice and that's confusing at the
very least.

James