Subject: Re: va_list pointers, bad(?) gcc code To: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz> From: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de> List: tech-toolchain Date: 11/11/2003 11:20:56
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:13:25AM +0100, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> #define va_copy __builtin_va_copy
There is no va_copy used in the test program, so why does this make a
differnece?
Martin