On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 06:40:29AM +0200, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:

> > We fix problems as they are found - and besides powerpc and i386, what
> > are realistic cross compile hosts others would expect to work? So
> > no need for systematic regression tests, IMHO.
> arm, prep. Wait - we can't boot the latter yet multi-user 
PReP is running multiuser well, at least in 1.6. My current build 
host, where I do the PowerStack II work, is a PReP machine. 
(IBM RS/6000 43P-100 to be precise.)

> (or do I confuse prep with chrp?)
Seams so. But AFAIK we can not boot _anything_ on CHRP at the moment. 
I have a CHRP [1] machine, a IBM RS/6000 B50. I am thinking about 
poting this machine once I have finished the PowerStack II. But I 
haven't evaluated the work necessary yet. It may be somthing from 
"trivial" like the PowerStack II up to a complete new sys/arch/chrp...

[1] Actually it is RPA. But RPA and CHRP seams to be "similar enough". 
-- 



tschüß,
         Jochen

Homepage: http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/