On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:04:22AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
>    
>    I fully agree with Nathan.
>    
>    /etc/build.conf (or even "./build.conf" relative to "build.sh")
>    is unnecessary.
> 
> 
> 
> "me too."

Having been bitten by crap _I_ accidentally left around in mk.conf (which
"you don't have to use!" either), I'd prefer not to have this.

-- 
Bill Squier (groo@old-ones.com)                          http://www.netbsd.org

        I know I don't deserve another chance, but this _is_ America,
        and as an American, aren't I entitled to one?  --Sideshow Bob.