Subject: re: make release vs make iso-image
To: Tracy Di Marco White <gendalia@gendalia.org>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 04/05/2002 11:50:26 
   
   I think 'make release' should build into $RELEASEDIR/$arch/ or such, so
   that make iso-image would create what sysinst expects.  sysinst tends to
   expect /i386/binary/sets for example, and make iso-image defaults to
   creating /binary/sets.  Is this an unreasonable change, is there a better
   suggestion?



i'd buy such a change.  infact, my $RELEASEDIR tends to *always*
end in "/$MACHINE" because we don't do this already.


.mrg.