Subject: Re: emuns on ARM: What should we do?
To: None <tech-toolchain@netbsd.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 01/21/2002 17:53:47
> How about writing a C compiler for something like the ICL System 25?
> This has a Ascii / BCD arithmetic engine!  Supporting integers up to
> 10 digits with sign overpunch.  The original (Singer system 10)
> system had 4 digit addresses, these were expanded by 3 binary bits
> and later by 2 more - giving a maximum address of 320,000 bytes.
> There are no bitwise operators, and no binary arithmetic.

That would make unsigned types, um, `interesting'.  I suspect it would
be a lot simpler to build a compiler for a mostly-C-like language that
happens to be better suited to the machine, kinda the way I've seen
almost-C compilers that had 8-bit ints, for microcontrollers....

This is getting rather far off of NetBSD topics, though.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B