On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Jason R Thorpe wrote:

:  > Looks fine to me, albeit that -lstdc++ -lm should always be included.  I
:  > know it's not "needed" for groff and gcc 2.95, but it's a good idea to make
:  > it consistent, since linking with "c++" without DESTDIR will add them.
:
: Hm?  We don't add -lgcc to the command line for non-DESTDIR builds...,
: so why do it for libstdc++ -lm?

No, I'm pointing out that when you *link* a program using "c++" (which
should be done if the program is C++, but I can't remember now if your patch
does this), you'll get -lstdc++ and -lm implicitly.  So we should be
consistent with that when using DESTDIR.

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <tv@wasabisystems.com>  *  Wasabi & NetBSD:  Run with it.
-- CDs, Integration, Embedding, Support -- http://www.wasabisystems.com/