Subject: Re: ldd /usr/lib/lib*.so vs. ldd /usr/pkg/lib/lib*.so
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
From: Todd Vierling <tv@wasabisystems.com>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 09/10/2000 23:33:21
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Hubert Feyrer wrote:

: > The reason much of the base system doesn't use interlibrary dependencies on
: > a regular basis is because NetBSD has supported (and periodically still
: > supports) PICless code systems.  However, that's not an argument for
: > restricting third party software from making use of interlibrary
: > dependencies in the base system--they should be there regardless.
: 
: So, what are we going to do on things like libssl/libcrypto?

"...they should be there regardless."

Meaning, libssl should link against libcrypto in the shlib case.

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <tv@wasabisystems.com>  *  http://www.wasabisystems.com/
-- Speed, stability, security, and support.  Wasabi NetBSD:  Run with it.