Subject: re: gcc/binutils/gdb import proposal
To: Todd Vierling <tv@pobox.com>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 07/17/2000 12:55:09
Build structure for gcc-2.95.2. "libgcc" is compiled -fpic;
"libgccP" is compiled -fPIC, only on platforms needing an alternate.
will you have libgccP be used automatically? on the SPARC, anything
moderately large really needs -fPIC.. we currently build most things
with -fPIC there...
as long as things "just work" for the end-user, this would be fine.
everything else looks great, though i don't really get the point of
moving everything in to usr.bin/binutils...i'd just get rid of the
binutils directory there entirely. i think, in particular, moving
GDB there is wrong.