On Wed, 31 May 2000, David Brownlee wrote:

> 	Are these workaround being documented (other than in the CVS logs
> 	:), so they can be revisited when gcc is updated?

I'll start keeping a list...

> 	Are we sending bug reports back to gcc about things like this?

My understanding is that many bugs related to c++ -O2 have been fixed in
newer gcc's so I haven't been sending back bug reports.  But perhaps I
should.


> 		David/absolute
> 				       -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --
> 
> On Wed, 31 May 2000, Dan McMahill wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Module Name:	pkgsrc
> > Committed By:	dmcmahill
> > Date:		Wed May 31 14:51:17 UTC 2000
> > 
> > Modified Files:
> > 	pkgsrc/audio/festival/files: patch-sum
> > 	pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches: patch-ai
> > Added Files:
> > 	pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches: patch-aj patch-ak patch-al
> > 
> > Log Message:
> > work around pmax compiler bug (c++ -O2) by not using -O2 on the remaining
> > 3 problem files when compiling on pmax.
> > 
> > 
> > To generate a diff of this commit:
> > cvs rdiff -r1.5 -r1.6 pkgsrc/audio/festival/files/patch-sum
> > cvs rdiff -r1.1 -r1.2 pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches/patch-ai
> > cvs rdiff -r0 -r1.1 pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches/patch-aj \
> >     pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches/patch-ak \
> >     pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches/patch-al
> > 
> > Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
> > copyright notices on the relevant files.
> > 
> > 
>