I've had pretty decent luck with egcs's FORTRAN77 stuff.  Specifically,
combining our f77 with Adaptor's f77->HPF converter yields a pretty workable
HPF environment (now if only I could get the !$*% FORTRAN bindings in pvm to
work...).

    Scott

----- Original Message -----
From: <mcmahill@mtl.mit.edu>
To: Todd Vierling <tv@pobox.com>
Cc: <tech-toolchain@netbsd.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: ratfor integration?


>
>
> I've not had the best of luck with egcs's f77.  I've had code which
> compiles under both g77 and f2c-f77 crash with the g77 compiled version.
> It may be the fault of the code, maybe the compiler.  I'm not a fortran
> programmer, but use some fortran code (specifically, the math/scilab
> package) which someone else has written.
>
> On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Todd Vierling wrote:
>
> > Considering we now ship egcs's f77, is there much concensus about
whether we
> > should include a Ratfor preprocessor?  There's a (albeit old, though
that
> > doesn't make much difference) public domain implementation on
> > sources.isc.org:/devel/lang/ ...
> >
> > --
> > -- Todd Vierling (tv@pobox.com)
> >
>
>