Jonathan Stone wrote:

> [[ divu problems deleted ]]
>
> Can anyone else report success for kernels on a 5000/50, 5000/150, or
> other r4000 for built with binutils 2.9.1?

On a /260:

	mona:pmax/stand-2stage/scsiboot 50> date
	Tue Mar  9 16:31:10 EST 1999
	mona:pmax/stand-2stage/scsiboot 51> as --version
	GNU assembler 2.9.1
	Copyright 1997 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
	This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
	the GNU General Public License.  This program has absolutely no warranty.
	This assembler was configured for a target of `mips-dec-netbsd'.
	mona:pmax/stand-2stage/scsiboot 52> ls -l `which as`
	-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  470840 Feb  8 11:32 /usr/bin/as*
	mona:pmax/stand-2stage/scsiboot 53> uname -a
	NetBSD mona 1.3K NetBSD 1.3K (MONA) #38: Tue Mar  9 10:32:51 EST 1999     simonb@mona:/NetBSD/src/sys/arch/pmax/compile/MONA pmax
	mona:pmax/stand-2stage/scsiboot 54> dmesg | grep -i r4 | tail -1
	cpu0 at mainbus0: cpu0: MIPS R4400 CPU Rev. 5.0 with MIPS R4010 FPC Rev. 0.0

I've done a "make clean" before building the kernel.  What problems
are you seeing?  If it's a silicon problem (I'm guessing, is this the
problem that may have been suggested is a silicon problem?) I'm on a
R4400, not an R4000...

Simon.

ps: vlad and mona "swapped" - I wanted the faster machine for -current.