Subject: Re: Host compile rules in
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@tpgi.com.au>
From: Todd Vierling <tv@NetBSD.ORG>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 04/16/1998 20:57:48
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Andrew Cagney wrote:

: Just a more general question,  why are people trying to perform a
: complex multi-stage build using a single build tree?

We aren't.  It's the confusion between target object files and host object
files, and the need for a compile rule other than .c.o that uses
${HOST_COMPILE.c}, that prompts the different extension.  The latter reason
is what started this whole thread--we have no "standard" Makefile rule to
compile host-based programs.

-- 
-- Todd Vierling (Personal tv@pobox.com; Bus. todd_vierling@xn.xerox.com)