tech-security archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: base OpenSSL is much, much slower than the package

To: tech-userlevel%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: base OpenSSL is much, much slower than the package
From: nia <nia%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 13:13:44 +0000

Right, yes, the CPUID stuff wasn't being defined when builing EVP which
meant the dumb asm implementation was being used instead of HW/VP/BSAES.

That's fixed now. Everything else appears to still be slightly slower,
but that's less critical than the AES implementation.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: base OpenSSL is much, much slower than the package
  - From: nia

References:
- base OpenSSL is much, much slower than the package
  - From: nia

Prev by Date: base OpenSSL is much, much slower than the package
Next by Date: Re: base OpenSSL is much, much slower than the package
Previous by Thread: base OpenSSL is much, much slower than the package
Next by Thread: Re: base OpenSSL is much, much slower than the package
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index