tech-security archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: kauth and socket calls (esp. bind())

To: tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost, tech-security%netbsd.org@localhost, tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: kauth and socket calls (esp. bind())
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 21:13:54 +0200

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 01:11:00PM +0000, Andrew Doran wrote:
> Do you think authorization is the correct tool to implement the classic
> bits of zones/jails?  I certainly don't.  What other examples are there?

Parts of it. Consider access to devices for example.

Joerg

References:
- kauth and socket calls (esp. bind())
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: kauth and socket calls (esp. bind())
  - From: Andrew Doran
- Re: kauth and socket calls (esp. bind())
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: kauth and socket calls (esp. bind())
  - From: Andrew Doran

Prev by Date: Re: kauth and socket calls (esp. bind())
Next by Date: Re: NetBSD 5.x security
Previous by Thread: Re: kauth and socket calls (esp. bind())
Next by Thread: NetBSD Security Advisory 2010-004: amd64 per-page No-execute (NX) bit disabled
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index