tech-security: Re: Integrating securelevel and kauth(9)

Subject: Re: Integrating securelevel and kauth(9)
To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-security
Date: 03/28/2006 14:20:15

--+ri2T0IZgb46yOXM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:52:21PM -0800, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> Probably because the folks with the energy to implement this want to go=
=20
> this way.

I sincerely hope this energy can be maintained, rather than drained by
the vampire leeches in the peanut gallery. Please, persist with your
good work via the more constructive aspects of the discussion.

--
Dan.


--+ri2T0IZgb46yOXM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFEKKtuEAVxvV4N66cRAqkiAJ9jHejZvbIqf50dJLJ8iEJTfNYGrACeNJbo
+eoqzmZiqdNOoin9H3XLqIg=
=UCEl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+ri2T0IZgb46yOXM--