On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

> "security" node doesn't seem to fit to the way how the rest of tree is
> currently organized.
> do you want to create "performance" top level node, which collects
> performance related knobs?  to me, "security" node seems something like that.

No, I think a "performance" node would be a bad idea. But security is
special, because it's so important. That said, I'm not sure it really
needs a separate node; I'd need to examine all the security-related
settings in context to see.

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson            <cjs@cynic.net>             +81 90 7737 2974
   The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism
   by those who have not got it.    --George Bernard Shaw