Thank you.
That explains it.
I still wonder why the *BSD's (Free and Net that is) wishes to follow this?
When you see this:
"Implement Access Control Lists according to POSIX1e." you think that this =
is a
standard since it says POSIX.

I understand that the POSIX 1e is the best description on how ACL (and
other security topic's)  should be implemented but it shouldn't be
"according to".
It should be based on it and then implement it the best possible way.

Only a few thoughts on the matter.

Thanks
// Dunceor

On 6/3/05, SODA Noriyuki <soda@sra.co.jp> wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:21:09 +0200, "Dunceor ." <dunceor@gmail.com> =
said:
>=20
> > I have read the documents and they sound good, so why was it withdrawn?
>=20
> The following mail described the reason:
> http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/bugtraq/1999/06/msg00194.html
> --
> soda
>