Subject: Re: SURVEY: Removal of Kerberos 4 from base
To: Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com>
From: Love <lha@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-security
Date: 04/15/2005 21:12:40
--=-=-=


Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com> writes:

>   BTW, I looks to me that Amanda have kerberos 5 support.
>
> Amanda has two live branches; the cvs repo structure is hard to
> follow.  One is the 2.4.4 branch, which is "stable" and what nearly
> everyone uses in production (2.4.4p2 is in pksrc/sysutils/amanda*, w/o
> kerberos enabled).  This has krb4 support only.  The 'head', known as
> 2.5.0, is not declared stable, but many people say it works, and it
> has a new security abstraction layer that also supports krb5 or
> gssapi/krb5 (not sure).  Moving to 2.5.0 from 2.4.4 is a nontrivial
> exercise for a production site, but it might not be that bad.

Ah, ok, I just read the documentation :)

Love


--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUAQmASK9o1gLFKFEjAAQIipQf9HXwZF/lff2CwH0AVXu3veij9tDwNqKXo
alD9bjfllR9wftB4tx3cJhDyEQn0FTlmlGvoRqFk38Kjnm2oB4JZSwsQXYR+UMoy
U4fsXU5cTtZ2kJ3rAH+19XfGMOpprcuPTKgQUwMiVu2Q93LrrTbnI0kInlOBOPFg
Yz9w8yOPVo3tIw3LSntveLomhCjBuhfir8f8/OvjL4jNEKegQzZdVlin9JH+mNQD
d6OJKdRIYUWHaVTmCb04z2c+bbYL8lxOHRqWExVQfMxBI4nJ8ui/CW1ERvqresA+
CdM8+DMDkEnNa4ygPu4LqOdHRe92vqttzKvoz0WtVgGtr/w2XRk4Tg==
=JbHg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--