In message <Pine.NEB.4.62.0504101222560.495@himring.draga.com>, Jim Wise writes
:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Martin Husemann wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 05:59:19PM +0200, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
>>> While we are at it, please rename the PF-specific spamd to pf-spamd or
>>> similar.
>>
>>I can see what name clash you are trying to avoid here, but note that this
>>spamd should not be pf specific (it should be easy to extend it to support
>>ipf). So maybe do not make the name too pf centric.
>
>I don't particularly mind if the name is pfspamd or something else, but 
>the name `spamd' is also the name of a _much_ more widely used product 
>which we distribute through pkgsrc, so the name shouldn't be `spamd' in 
>any case... :-)
>

Agreed.

		--Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb