On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> At the time where I wrote GBDE, the best that was offered was CGD (and
> similar) and users (not cryptographers!) didn't trust it

Could you back up this claim, insofar that "users" did not trust cgd?  I
haven't seen any distrust of cgd -- in fact, I've seen quite a bit of
welcome acceptace of cgd by both users *and* cryptographers.

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org> <tv@pobox.com>