Subject: Re: verified executable kernel modification committed
To: Brett Lymn <email@example.com>
From: Dries Schellekens <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/30/2002 09:30:28
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 03:40:55PM +0000, Ceri Storey wrote:
> > Is there an outline of any future work that is planned on this? I'm
> > doing a similar thing for my C.S. degree project, and was hoping to
> > avoid re-inventing any wheels if I can avoid it.
> Not right at the moment - I want to get this settled first. One of
> the obvious ones is performance, there are some things that can be
> done to make this better, another is the loading of the fingerprints.
> I will work on a road map once I have had a bit of a think.
How does it compare to TrojanProof and Stephanie k5?
The Design of k5: http://www.innu.org/~brian/Stephanie/dist/Stephanie-3.1/doc/DESIGN.k5