Subject: Re: what's in a name? fingerprinted exec
To: Brett Lymn <blymn@baesystems.com.au>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: tech-security
Date: 10/15/2002 11:08:32 
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Brett Lymn wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:10:44PM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
>
> 1) secure exec
> 2) trusted exec
> 3) verified exec
>
> At the moment I think 2 conveys what I am on about best...(but 1 means
> less changes for me ;-)

I think verified exec is best, but it is a mouthful. How about V exec or
Vexec, where V is for verified? :-)

Take care,

Bill