[NOTE: I've trimmed the CC: line]

On 21 Dec, Mipam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:08:46AM -0800, opentrax@email.com wrote:
>> >
>> You state that SSH offers "better encryption" and authentication. What
>> assurances do you have of that? Can you really say that is the case?
> 
> Okay, lets get back to your initial request.
> First here is a nice list of features which ssh has to offer:
> 
> http://www.openssh.com/features.html
> 
> Then look here for details:
> 
> http://www.openssh.com/manual.html
> 
> Here are links to the internet drafts of ssh concerning
> transport layer, user authentication layer and more.
> Also a link is here to the architecure draft of ssh2.
> These will provide you with the info you need to know,
>
I've read the HTML pages and drafts you've noted.

> however they're quite technical and perhaps you need to read them
> over 3 or even more times, like i am doing now again.
> After reading this i guess many questions will be answered.
> And .... why would you want to use "secure" telnet?
> Everybody uses ssh and will use ssh2 if not allrdy used.
> That surely isnt the case with stelnet.
> Moreover ... security isnt an after thought, it must be build in with
> the very design. That's another reason why i dont use stelnet.
> Bye,
> 
Should I now assume that, perhaps, you need to read
the aforementioned material to answer my question?

				Jessem.