Subject: Re: Weekly BSD Security Digest 2000/07/10 to 2000/07/16
To: None <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
From: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
List: tech-security
Date: 07/21/2000 13:59:29
  by mail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2000 04:59:48 -0000
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id NAA01921;
	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:59:29 +0900 (JST)
To: hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de
cc: tech-x11@netbsd.org, tech-security@netbsd.org
In-reply-to: feyrer's message of Fri, 21 Jul 2000 03:16:47 +0200.
      <Pine.GSO.4.10.10007210313510.11355-100000@rfhpc8320.fh-regensburg.de>
Subject: Re: Weekly BSD Security Digest 2000/07/10 to 2000/07/16
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:59:29 +0900
Message-ID: <1919.964155569@coconut.itojun.org>


>The Weekly BSD Security Digest 2000/07/10 to 2000/07/16
>(http://www.securityportal.com/topnews/weekly/bsd20000717.html) mentions
>some X holes in viarous parts of X: libICE, X server, libX11.  
>Are we affected by these?

	unfortunately, i think so.
	we'll need to put fixes into, i've looked into xfree86.org
	ftp server and found no patch for them when i checked.  sorry that
	i did not report my (rather unfortunate) experience sooner.

itojun