by mail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 27 May 2000 12:30:35 -0000
	by inner.net (8.7.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA07339;
	Sat, 27 May 2000 12:21:23 GMT
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000527082831.00976aa0@avarice.inner.net>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 08:30:12 +0100
To: itojun@iijlab.net
From: RJ Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
Subject: Re: Foward: FreeBSD Security Advisory:
  FreeBSD-SA-00:19.semconfig
Cc: tech-security@netbsd.org
In-Reply-To: <14855.959430262@coconut.itojun.org>
References: <taca's message of Sat, 27 May 2000 09:40:17 JST. <200005270040.e4R0eH601823@edge.sky.yamashina.kyoto.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 13:24 27-05-00 , itojun@iijlab.net wrote:

> >>  > This advisory says that the problem also exists in NetBSD.
> >> The advisory is wrong[*].
> >Wow, What a good news!
>
>         shouldn't we state it on the webpage?

Yes.  NetBSD should.

>also we should try
>         talking with security-officer@freebsd.org for update/correction to
>         freebsd advisory...

Yes.  NetBSD should.

And the NetBSD Security Officer should post a specific, detailed
correction (e.g. content from Bill's email) directly to the BugTraq list...

Ran
rja@inet.org