by redmail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2000 19:15:57 -0000
	by rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA18362;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:15:30 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:16:01 +0100 (MET)
From: Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
Reply-To: hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de
To: Mipam <reinoud@ibbnet.org>
cc: tech-security@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: procfs
In-Reply-To: <20000222153917.A14552@ibb0021.ibb.uu.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10002222015390.12675-100000@rfhpc8320.fh-regensburg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Mipam wrote:
> The security described here: http://linuxtoday.com/stories/17085.html for which there is alrdy a patch, is this patch included in the most up to date release source? I assume it has been implemented in the current source, but i wasnt sure about the release source. In that case, supping the release source and building a new kernel would remedy this problem right?

If you're referring to the netbsd-1-4 branch (which will RSN become
1.4.2), yes, this was fixed there.


 - Hubert

-- 
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra