Subject: Re: NetBSD Security Advisory 2000-001
To: None <tech-security@netbsd.org>
From: Chris Jones <chris@cjones.org>
List: tech-security
Date: 02/15/2000 14:38:49
  by redmail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2000 21:40:36 -0000
	by reddwarf.rightnowtech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA21662;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2000 14:38:50 -0700 (MST)
To: tech-security@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: NetBSD Security Advisory 2000-001
References: <14505.23693.773699.404104@passion.geek.com.au>
From: Chris Jones <chris@cjones.org>
Date: 15 Feb 2000 14:38:49 -0700
Message-ID: <x6zot2w3h2.fsf@reddwarf.rightnowtech.com>
Lines: 21
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Daniel Carosone <security-officer@netbsd.org> writes:

> Solutions and Workarounds
> =========================

[...]

> If this action cannot be taken, an immediate workaround is to disable
> the use of the proc filesystem. It is not mounted by default in NetBSD,
> and nothing in the NetBSD base tree depends on it. You can disable
> it by removing any procfs lines from /etc/fstab.

What about user mounts of procfs filesystems?

Chris

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------chris@cjones.org
Chris Jones                                          cjones@honors.montana.edu
           Mad scientist at large
"Is this going to be a stand-up programming session, sir, or another bug hunt?"