Subject: Re: login.conf integration?
To: Martin J. Laubach <mjl@emsi.priv.at>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
List: tech-security
Date: 01/23/2000 22:31:25
  by redmail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2000 21:31:27 -0000
	by antioche.lip6.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA04266;
	Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:31:25 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:31:25 +0100
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
To: "Martin J. Laubach" <mjl@emsi.priv.at>
Cc: tech-security@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: login.conf integration?
Message-ID: <20000123223125.A14853@antioche.lip6.fr>
References: <200001231242.NAA01637@cactus.emsi.priv.at> <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000123081035.2575A-100000@marcy.nas.nasa.gov> <200001232000.VAA02366@cactus.emsi.priv.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <200001232000.VAA02366@cactus.emsi.priv.at>; from Martin J. Laubach on Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 09:00:14PM +0100

On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 09:00:14PM +0100, Martin J. Laubach wrote:
>   So what now? I don't really care much which solution we adopt
> (a) su squashing the previously set path for the default path
> (or what is set in login.conf) as it is now, or (b) reverting
> to what we had before, su leaving the path alone.

Well, I think a is better is the default can be tweaked.

--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--