by redmail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 1999 13:25:53 -0000
	by acheron.middleboro.ma.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA08614;
	Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:25:44 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:25:44 -0400
From: Mason Loring Bliss <mason@acheron.middleboro.ma.us>
To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
Cc: tech-security@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: Odd ipf behaviour?
Message-ID: <19990920092544.R485@acheron.middleboro.ma.us>
References: <19990919221430.L485@acheron.middleboro.ma.us> <19990920113942.A4576@antioche.lip6.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <19990920113942.A4576@antioche.lip6.fr>

On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:39:42AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:

> Isn't 209.67.38.62 on the same subnet as your ep0 interface ?
> If so they don't have to be source routed.

No, my IP is 24.218.72.110. Definitely different parts of town. :) But even
so, the destination IP was in my internal ten net, so even on the subnet it
would have to be source-routed, wouldn't it? My outside interface doesn't
answer to a ten address, so to get a ten address to it, you have to explicitly
route it there... At least, that was my understanding.

-- 
    Mason Loring Bliss  mason@acheron.middleboro.ma.us  They also surf who
awake ? sleep : dream;  http://acheron.ne.mediaone.net  only stand on waves.