Subject: Re: what to put into cryptosrc-intl tree
To: Todd Vierling <tv@pobox.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@nas.nasa.gov>
List: tech-security
Date: 06/23/1999 12:46:40
On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Todd Vierling wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> 
> : > > 4. kerberos IV (eBones)
> : > 
> : > I oppose this. No new code using DES. DES is not good enough for our
> : > source tree.

?? When did we gain crypto strength requirements?

> : This is not really new code; this functionality already exists in
> : domestic/cryptsrc-us.
> 
> And *people use it, dammit.*  :)

I agree with this. People use kerb IV. Even if we think it's not as tough
as we'd like, people still use it. As such, we should support it.

Take care,

Bill