Subject: Re: what to put into cryptosrc-intl tree
To: None <perry@piermont.com>
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>
List: tech-security
Date: 06/23/1999 14:00:58 
> > 4. kerberos IV (eBones)
> 
> I oppose this. No new code using DES. DES is not good enough for our
> source tree.

This is not really new code; this functionality already exists in
domestic/cryptsrc-us.

I support adding eBones until such time as kerberos v5 support exists
in the tree.

						- Bill