On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:46:05AM -0600, Peter Seebach wrote:
> 3.  Is anyone else looking at this, or interested in kibitzing on such a
> project?

I'd very much like to have such a driver (but have no time to help right
now).

> On the one hand, this is a pretty huge chunk of code; on the other hand,
> it looks as though the driver has to do all sorts of stuff to specially
> handle writev and other variant calls itself, so there's probably a lot
> of duplication.

I think there should be a design first - huge chunk of code sounds not
good. Maybe discuss this on tech-kern first?

I could imagine a driver that just is good enough to dd an image to it
for now, and something layered above later to get effective filesystem
support. For the first step, the chunk of code can not realy be huge.

Martin