On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:57:24PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > I'm sorry but I think this is awkward. If we decided to branch over
> > to the "xcursor" package we should stick with that decision and
> > not simply change our mind and use "libXcursor" instead.
> 
> As Jeremy wrote -- libXcursor is the successor of the xcursor package
> and xcursor is just archaic.

Can "libXcursor" be used on a XFree86 system?

If it can't we apparently still need it. But that doesn't mean that system
with a native X.org should get anywhere near that package.

	Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                  http://zhadum.org.uk/