On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:46:34PM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 07:27:14PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > No.
> > 
> > 2) X11_TYPE=native and system has xcursor included ->
> > x11/xcursor/builtin.mk skips the dependency.
> > 
> > 3) X11_TYPE=native and system has no xcursor -> x11/xcursor is the
> > dependency.
> > 
> > With the change, libXcursor is used directly iff there's no native
> > implementation.
> 
> I'm sorry but I think this is awkward. If we decided to branch over
> to the "xcursor" package we should stick with that decision and
> not simply change our mind and use "libXcursor" instead.

As Jeremy wrote -- libXcursor is the successor of the xcursor package
and xcursor is just archaic.

Joerg