Subject: Re: options magick or imagemagick?
To: Klaus Heinz <k.heinz@oktsieben.kh-22.de>
From: OBATA Akio <obata@lins.jp>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 10/16/2007 09:44:00
Hi,

On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:57:35 +0900, Klaus Heinz <k.heinz@oktsieben.kh-22.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> mk/defaults/options.description contains
>
>   bugzilla-imagemagick    Compress .BMPs to save space.
>   graphicsmagick          Use GraphicsMagick as imaging library.
>   imagemagick             Use ImageMagick as imaging library.
>   magick
>
> As far as I could determine "imagemagick" is used by graphics/ruby-RMagick
> and multimedia/transcode while "magick" is used only by graphics/zphoto.
>
> I propose to remove "magick" and change the option for graphics/zphoto
> to "imagemagick".
>
> Any other package affected by this?

RMagick/zphoto/GraphicsMagick is mine :-)
I'm okay to rename "magick" optfion for zphoto.

I added "magick" option for zphoto, since zphoto's configure option name is "magick".
Then I added "imagemagick" and "graphicsmagick" option for RMagick, since RMagick supports
both ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick and I added GraphicsMagick for RMagick.
(but graphicsmagick option will be removed because RMagick 2.0 will not support GraphicsMagick:-<
  ImageMagick is sucks!)

-- 
"Of course I love NetBSD":-)
OBATA Akio / obata@lins.jp