Matthias Scheler wrote:
> The result of this change is that every package including
> "pkgsrc/devel/binutils/buildlink3.mk" (e.g. "pkgsrc/multimedia/mplayer")
> no requires the "binutils" package from "pkgsrc". This was not necessary
> before and the "mplayer" package could be build without problems that way.

But the pkgsrc package provides the libraries and headers. Shouldn't a 
built-in package provide the same things as a pkgsrc one?

How is a "good enough" system-provided package defined? There's nothing 
in the pkgsrc guide about this topic. :(

Roland