Subject: Re: Publishing code and VCSs
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
From: Adam Hamsik <haaaad@gmail.com>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 07/10/2007 17:05:21
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Jul 10, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Hubert Feyrer wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
>> Now that you bring that up... we'd shorten boost's build times a  
>> lot by splitting each binary library in its own package.  It  
>> should be fairly trivial, but when I proposed it people seemed to  
>> dislike the idea :-(
>
> IIRC the monotone folks worked on getting rid of boost altogether,  
> which I'd prefer over surgery on boost.
>
that would be great, because I see only problem with monotone and  
it's boost :). I thought also about git (it's pure C no python and no  
c++:) everyone who use it say only good about it's performance (Yes I  
know that git has horrible interface).

>
>> BTW, extatic?  What was the correct word? ;-)
>
> Extatic? Hyped-up? I don't care. :)
>
>
>  - Hubert

Regards
- -----------------------------------------
Adam Hamsik
jabber: haad@jabber.org
icq: 249727910

Proud NetBSD user.

We program to have fun.
Even when we program for money, we want to have fun as well.
~ Yukihiro Matsumoto




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFGk6AxlIxPgX3Go0MRAieaAJ0XLfYX/sdSBbIcqpNJ79Jid54oDgCfXRMi
DLM/VvKOkSdevOYRZkKVh0w=
=mSJo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----